|
|
|
Roaring market
erodes new rental building
The Real Deal -
article linkWithin the
spectacle that is the New York real estate
market, rental units are pulling off a vanishing
act.
Soaring land prices and construction costs are
making the newly developed rental unit a nearly
endangered species and some older rentals are
disappearing due to conversion, say market
observers.
"A lot of buildings are going from rental to
condo," says Andrew Heiberger, who recently
formed Buttonwood Real Estate, after leaving
another company he founded, Citi Habitats, the
city's biggest rental firm. "Between land prices
and the huge cost of construction, rental
buildings will not be built or planned or
financed, because they can't be underwritten for
a number of years."
Heiberger left his old company to start a
development firm that has the freedom to focus
on the condo market. Construction of new rental
buildings has slowed for the moment, he says,
though that may change.
"There couldn't even be enough supply of rental
units," Heiberger says. "When I was at Citi
Habitats in 2004, we charted how many big rental
buildings of 50 units or more were built since
1995, and that was over 100 below 96th Street.
"Now, there's nothing even close to that going
on for rental – it's more like five buildings."
Yet a representative with the city's Rent
Guidelines Board says the lack of new rental
development is just a drop in the bucket
compared to overall rental inventory. The United
States Census Bureau conducts a triennial
housing survey for the city, and results from
2002, the most recent figures available, show
the percentage of rental units to be 67.6, or
about 2 million of the total New York City
market of 3 million units.
The bureau is updating figures for 2005, and
many in the real estate industry predict a shift
of several percentage points in favor of
for-sale housing.
"I've been saying for 12 months that the prices
of the rental market are poised to rise
rapidly," Heiberger says. "When the vacancy rate
gets below 2 percent, which is basically a
no-vacancy rate, supply dries up, which it has,
and prices will rise."
The flat rental market dates back to 1999, but
government incentives, such as the Liberty Bonds
program, which spurred construction of rental
housing Downtown, have disrupted typical market
forces. The Liberty Bonds program still has
about $200 million to be issued, enough to fund
one large project. It should create 4,597 rental
units, or about a third of the units built south
of Canal Street since 2001.
But with government incentives expiring, the
creation of rental housing may suffer a serious
setback.
"If you look at the history of rental
development over the past 15 years, you see that
most of it was spawned by tax incentives," says
Nancy Packes, president of the project marketing
division at Brown Harris Stevens. "So government
always has the ability to provide incentives for
rental development."
While Packes maintains that the development of
rental buildings has occurred without government
help – there's the Anthem at 222 East 34th
Street, 1 Sutton Place North, and many of the
buildings done by RFR Davis – others believe
that government assistance is the only way to
create rental properties in the city.
"What's happened today is that prices of condos
have been going over $1,000 a square foot, so
the spread on the return between a condo and a
rental is so big, why would you do a rental?"
asks Ofer Yardeni, a managing director of
Stonehenge Partners, a firm which purchases
rental buildings, most recently buying the
333-unit Pennmark at 315 West 33rd Street.
The huge spread between the return on rentals
and condominiums even makes it undesirable to
develop a rental project on an empty parking lot
or in combination with sales units, though The
Related Companies is doing the latter at 215
East 96th Street.
Fred Harris, senior vice president for
development at AvalonBay Communities, says the
disparity between rental and sales prices is a
national phenomenon, with the ratio of home
values to rental costs skewed even further in
cities in California and Florida. New York
City's spread is currently about 25.5 versus 34
in San Francisco.
"Our market is not the most disparate," Harris
says. He maintains that rental housing can be
created in New York. AvalonBay is doing so in a
361-unit mixed-used complex being developed on
the Lower East Side called Avalon Chrystie
Place. Twenty percent of the units there are
priced for families with lower incomes.
Besides government incentives like the 80-20
provision that provides for affordable housing,
there are market forces that are pushing for the
creation of rental housing, Harris says. "One
way you can get some rental housing – and it's a
vanishing type deal – is a city government RFP
(request for proposal)," he says. "That doesn't
absolutely require rental, but it is difficult
to do it any other way."
Also, REITs (real estate investment trusts) such
as AvalonBay are limited in their ability to
build condominiums.
With the majority of the New York City real
estate market being rentals in 2002 – the
opposite of all other U.S. markets – Harris says
the market is due for a turn toward increased
home ownership.
A shortage of rental housing is not going to
make much difference in the sense that rental
prices are going to go up wildly," Packes says.
"But if you're an employer, and you're looking
at the cost index of living someplace, and you
have a younger work population, we don't want
people moving to New Jersey anymore.
|